vi. Voluntary restitution to victim Relevant Cases: NI Cases: 1. Immaturity can also result from atypical brain development. The extent to which the offender has complied with the conditions of a licence or order (including the time that has elapsed since its commencement) will be a relevant consideration. As far as defending for handling stolen goods cases, we’ve had extensive experience. It explains the elements of the offence to be proved including the requirement of knowing or believing the goods to be stolen. Driving under the influence i. Forgery etc. Over three decades of helping people like you to either avoid imprisonment altogether or to get their cases reduced, means that we have also developed a broad network of legal specialists. Reoffending rates for first offenders are significantly lower than rates for repeat offenders. Adjustment should be made for any significant additional harm factors where very high value goods are stolen. To be guilty of the offence of handling stolen goods under TA 1968, you must either know the goods are stolen or believe them to be stolen at the time of handling the goods. The court should consider the time gap since the previous conviction and the reason for it. Where the offence has caused risk of loss but no (or much less) actual loss the normal approach is to move down to the corresponding point in the next category. When considering a custodial or community sentence for a young adult the National Probation Service should address these issues in a PSR. Magistrates: Consult your legal adviser before deciding to sentence to custody without a pre-sentence report. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. The Crown Court can take into account summary only offences provided the TICs are founded on the same facts or evidence as the indictable charge, or are part of a series of offences of the same or similar character as the indictable conviction offence. This Sentencing Snapshot describes sentencing outcomes [] for the offence of handling stolen goods in the County Court of Victoria between 2009–10 and 2013–14. Search for stolen goods 50 29. "}},{"@type":"Question","name":"WHAT ARE SOME OF THE MITIGATING FACTORS THAT MIGHT REDUCE THE HANDLING OF STOLEN GOODS SENTENCE? It was clear, even at that stage, that the context of widespread disorder would be seen as a serious aggravation of offences such as burglary, theft and handling stolen goods. The following factors should be weighed in considering whether it is possible to suspend the sentence: Factors indicating that it would not be appropriate to suspend a custodial sentence, Factors indicating that it may be appropriate to suspend a custodial sentence, Offender presents a risk/danger to the public, Appropriate punishment can only be achieved by immediate custody, History of poor compliance with court orders, Immediate custody will result in significant harmful impact upon others. If the accused does not want to plead guilty, then it’s essential for the solicitor to regularly inform the Court throughout the trial of the reasons why the client’s plea is not guilty. There is a greater capacity for change in immature offenders and they may be receptive to opportunities to address their offending behaviour and change their conduct. Although the police meet some of the costs involved in the prosecution, the costs of investigation are typically sought from the convicted. Our legal experts will provide you with answers and guidance on what you should do to lessen your sentence or to get your case dismissed entirely. At the end of the case, the prosecutor under The Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 will request the Judge to order a sum to be paid for the costs incurred by the prosecutor in bringing the prosecution.\nVictims surcharges\n\nThe term victims’ surcharges can be explained as paying compensation to a fund for victims and can range between £20 to £170 depending on what sentence you were given at conviction.\n\nHow sentences can be added to national information databases\n\nSeveral national databases hold information about individuals and any allegations made about them, their criminal and court records. The period of the endorsement will depend on the nature and length of your sentence.\n\nBelow are details on how long you will be listed as holding a criminal record if convicted. Where there is a large number of TICs, it may be appropriate to move outside the category range, although this must be considered in the context of the case and subject to the principle of totality. This is something very serious to consider when it comes to future employment. In general, only one requirement will be appropriate and the length may be curtailed if additional requirements are necessary, More intensive sentences which combine two or more requirements may be appropriate. Charges for handling stolen goods are brought under the Theft Act 1968 – and Section 34 of the Act defines “goods” as money and every other description of property, with the exception of land. Care should be taken to avoid double counting factors including those already taken into account in assessing culpability or harm. Ancillary orders that are typically added to the penalty for those who are found to be guilty of handling stolen goods include: As part of your investigation, you may also have your assets frozen with the possibility of having cash or other assets seized. Causing death by driving ii. Section 64 of the Sentencing Code states: In considering the seriousness of any offence committed while the offender was on bail, the court must -, (a) treat the fact that it was committed in those circumstances as an aggravating factor and. A court should generally only take offences into consideration if the following procedural provisions have been satisfied: The sentence imposed on an offender should, in most circumstances, be increased to reflect the fact that other offences have been taken into consideration. The requirements are identical to those available for community orders, see the guideline on Imposition of Community and Custodial Sentences. Get in touch with us now for possession of handling stolen goods legal help. They will not only demand to see all evidence that the police have against you, but they can advise you of what and what not to say. There will be a consideration put on what the value of the goods is, and what level of blame the person has. App. 1217 1. Destroying or damaging property viii. {"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"HAVE YOU BEEN CHARGED OR ARRESTED FOR HANDLING STOLEN GOODS? There will be a police interview to get through, and then a potential court date. This goes down to one-tenth on the first day of the trial and to zero if entered during the course of the trial. Criminal justice – where does the Council fit? You facilitate the purchase of the stolen jewellery and are the go-between for the thief and your friend. Continue through the sentencing process including: consider whether the frank admission of a number of offences is an indication of a defendant's remorse or determination and/ or demonstration of steps taken to address addiction or offending behaviour; any reduction for a guilty plea should be applied to the overall sentence; when considering ancillary orders these can be considered in relation to any or all of the TICs, specifically: This factor should increase the sentence only where there is clear evidence of wider harm not already taken into account elsewhere. Consider whether there are any aggravating or mitigating factors that justify an upward or downward adjustment from the starting point. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Any appropriate rehabilitative requirement(s), Curfew requirement for example up to 16 hours per day for a few weeks, Attendance centre requirement (where available), Curfew requirement for example up to 16 hours for 2 – 3 months, Exclusion requirement lasting in the region of 6 months, Curfew requirement for example up to 16 hours per day for 4 – 12 months, Exclusion requirement lasting in the region of 12 months. This website uses cookies to improve your experience. This will be particularly relevant where the court is considering whether to impose a sentence that focuses on rehabilitation. 16 describes sentencing outcomes for the offence of handling stolen goods in the County Court of Victoria between 2001-02 and 2005-06. 75 describes sentencing outcomes for the offence of handling stolen goods in the County Court of Victoria between 2003-04 and 2007-08. When considering the totality of previous offending a court should take a rounded view of the previous crimes and not simply aggregate the individual offences. In addition when sentencing an offender who is pregnant relevant considerations may include: The court should ensure that it has all relevant information about dependent children before deciding on sentence. For example: where the TIC attracts mandatory disqualification or endorsement and the offence(s) for which the defendant is to be sentenced do not; where the TIC constitutes a breach of an earlier sentence; where the TIC is a specified offence for the purposes of. There are many other examples of acts that would be classified as the handling stolen goods offence. The court must proceed with a view to making a confiscation order if it is asked to do so by the prosecutor or if the court believes it is appropriate for it to do so. Ancillary orders – Crown Court Compendium, Part II Sentencing, s7. You may be expected to pay a hefty fine. The offence guidelines include two structures: pre-Sentencing Council guidelines (used by the Sentencing Guidelines Council) and Sentencing Council guidelines. In exercising its discretion the court should take into account that TICs are capable of reflecting the offender's overall criminality. 48 Enforcement and Procedure 28. Handling stolen property is a dishonesty offence, which is sometimes also referred to as “fencing”. ... Hi, i am actually on bail. For instance, for handling stolen goods of less than £1,000 the usual starting point is a fine or low-level community penalty. Stop using them. More than half those imprisoned were charged with theft or handling stolen goods, receiving an average of 5.1 months. It is an offence to accept, take or receive property that has been stolen. The clear intention of the threshold test is to reserve prison as a punishment for the most serious offences. The court can take account of physical disability or a serious medical condition by way of mitigation as a reason for reducing the length of the sentence, either on the ground of the greater impact which imprisonment will have on the offender, or as a matter of generally expressed mercy in the individual circumstances of the case. They will not only demand to see all evidence that the police have against you, but they can advise you of what and what not to say. Handling money from stolen goods – if you are aware that the money is from the sale of the stolen goods, you could also be charged with this offence. For offenders aged 18 and over, pleading guilty early on in a case can reduce a sentence by as much as one third (maximum). Here are the guidelines that judges and magistrates receive to decide what sentence to give. This factor is particularly relevant where an offender is on the cusp of custody or where the suitability of a community order is being considered. the custody threshold has been passed; and, if so. This means that it may result in a custodial sentence, or it may result in a community-based sentence. The information that judges receive with regards to sentencing are only guidelines, and each case will be looked at individually. The level of culpability is determined by weighing up all the factors of the case to determine the offender’s role and the extent to which the offending was planned and the sophisticationwith which it was carried out. An immature offender may find it particularly difficult to cope with the requirements of a community order without appropriate support. The following is a non-exhaustive list of additional factual elements providing the context of the offence and factors relating to the offender. Passing the custody threshold does not mean that a custodial sentence should be deemed inevitable. the goods having been stolen The offence is committed while the defendant is acting otherwise than in the course of stealing. Starting points and ranges apply to all offenders, whether they have pleaded guilty or been convicted after trial. Leaving care services may change at the age of 21 and cease at the age of 25, unless the young adult is in education at that point). The impact of metal thefts will be reflected at step one, as a key driver of the sentencing starting point, in the consideration of harm. During the police interview, they will be trying to collect evidence that they can use against you in Court. The court should take account of any potential reduction for a guilty plea in accordance with section 73 of the Sentencing Code and the Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea guideline. R v Webbe and Others[2002] 1 Cr. 2. The term ‘spent’ refers to when your name can be removed from the databases. The court should determine the offence category with reference only to the factors identified in the following tables. v) A custodial sentence that is suspended should be for the same term that would have applied if the sentence was to be served immediately. 27. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. 4. Consecutive sentences for multiple offences may be appropriate – please refer to the Totality guideline. By Daniel Hopkins @DanHopkinsBN News Reporter. Within each offence, the Council has specified a number of categories which reflect varying degrees of seriousness. This Sentencing Snapshot describes sentencing outcomes for the offence of handling stolen goods and details the age and gender of people sentenced for this offence in the County Court of Victoria between 2007–08 and 2011–12. The later the plea is entered, the smaller the reduction.\n\n‘Early on’ refers to ‘the first stage of the proceedings’ and means anytime up to and including the first hearing at the Magistrates Court or Crown Court for indictable offences.\n\nIf a plea is entered 14 days after the first hearing, for example, the maximum level of reduction is just 20% or one-fifth of the sentence. (b) state in open court that the offence is so aggravated. Secondly, that evidence must be before the court in the specific case being considered with the relevant statements or reports having been made available to the Crown and defence in good time so that meaningful representations about that material can be made. The new definitive guideline brought together guidelines for However, for some common offences, such as theft of a motor vehicle or theft of a bicycle there was no existing guideline. If you have any questions about what fits into this offence, then call us on 0208 888 5225, and we will be able to provide you with further information.Handling stolen goods is typically the handling of any stolen goods, including money, but except for land. handling stolen goods (section 22) and going equipped to steal or commit burglary with intent to steal (section 25) Prosecutors considering these offences (or … Where the offender is dealt with separately for a breach of a licence or order regard should be had to totality. [] Adjustments made by the Court of Appeal to sentence or conviction as at June 2014 have been incorporated into the data in this Snapshot. The guidelines will apply to the full range of theft offences, such as shop theft, pick-pocketing, handling stolen goods, stealing by employees or care workers and abstraction of electricity. We’ve been doing this for over thirty years and know every argument inside out. Numerous appellate decisions are explained and discussed in context, such as the developing case law on automatic life sentences, extended sentences, detention and training orders, victim impact evidence, and a range of new sentencing guideline decisions including drug offences, racially aggravated offences and handling stolen. Property over £1,000 for resale or £1,000 for personal use or presence of aggravating feature. However, under section 4(2) of the Theft Act, land cannot be stolen unless one of the following elements occurs: Where the defendant is a trustee, representative or has authorised power of attorney and deals with the property in breach of trust; The sentence could range from community service to a prison term of a maximum of fourteen years.\n\nHere are the guidelines that judges and magistrates receive to decide what sentence to give.\n\nThe level of culpability is determined by weighing up all the factors of the case to determine the offender’s role and the extent to which the offending was planned and the sophistication with which it was carried out.\n\nCULPABILITY DEMONSTRATED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING\nA – HIGH CULPABILITY\nA leading role where offending is part of a group activity\nInvolvement of others through pressure, influence\nAbuse of position of power or trust or responsibility\nSophisticated nature of offence/significant planning\nFraudulent activity conducted over sustained period of time\nLarge number of victims\nDeliberately targeting victim on basis of vulnerability\nB – MEDIUM CULPABILITY\nA significant role where offending is part of a group activity\nOther cases that fall between categories A or C because:\nFactors are present in A and C which balance each other out and/or\nThe offender’s culpability falls between the factors as described in A and C\nC – LESSER CULPABILITY\nInvolved through coercion, intimidation or exploitation\nNot motivated by personal gain\nPeripheral role in organised fraud\nOpportunistic ‘one-off’ offence; very little or no planning\nLimited awareness or understanding of the extent of fraudulent activity\nWhere there are characteristics present which fall under different levels of culpability, the Court should balance these characteristics to reach a fair assessment of the offender’s culpability.\n\nHARM\nHarm is initially assessed by the actual, intended or risked loss as may arise from the offence.\n\nThe values in the table below are to be used for actual or intended loss only.\n\nIntended loss relates to offences where circumstances prevent the actual loss that is intended to be caused by the fraudulent activity.\n\nRisk of loss (for instance in mortgage frauds) involves consideration of both the likelihood of harm occurring and the extent of it if it does. Where an offender has turned 18 between the commission of the offence and conviction the court should take as its starting point the sentence likely to have been imposed on the date at which the offence was committed, but applying the purposes of sentencing adult offenders. R v Webbe [2002] 1 Cr App R(S) 22 Notes: 1. Community Order – 12 weeks. There is no general definition of where the custody threshold lies. Starting points define the position within a category range from which to start calculating the provisional sentence. It takes place after a theft or other dishonest acquisition is completed and may be committed by a fence or other person who helps the thief to realise the value of the stolen goods. However, the property must have been stolen in a manner which would amount to a serious indictable offence which is any offence carrying five or more years imprisonment such as Larceny , Robbery or Break, Enter and Steal . 167. After these times, there is a sliding scale of credit applied. The offences happened between June 2015 and November 2018 and involve vehicles, vehicle parts and plant machinery. You won’t know what the outcome of any court case might be. Handling stolen goods. Taken from the Offences Taken into Consideration Definitive Guideline: When sentencing an offender who requests offences to be taken into consideration (TICs), courts should pass a total sentence which reflects all the offending behaviour. To understand the actus reus and mens rea components of theft, burglary, robbery, handling stolen goods, making off without payment, criminal damage and arson. (Young adult care leavers are entitled to time limited support. Practice Note: Handling stolen goods which explains the offence of handling under TA 1968, s 22. Step 1 – Determining the offence category, Failure to comply with current court orders, Established evidence of community/wider impact, Serious medical condition requiring urgent, intensive or long-term treatment, Age and/or lack of maturity where it affects the responsibility of the offender, Sole or primary carer for dependent relatives, Determination and/or demonstration of steps having been taken to address addiction or offending behaviour. The entire costs of the prosecutor, including fees for the use of external Barristers used by the CPS, can be recovered from the defendant, subject to means. General principles to be considered in the sentencing of children and young people are in the Sentencing Council definitive guideline, Sentencing children and young people - overarching principles. Property below £1,000 for own use. For further information see Imposition of community and custodial sentences. Accordingly offenders should normally be sentenced by straightforward application of the guidelines without aggravation for the fact that their activity contributed to a harmful social effect upon a neighbourhood or community. It is not open to a sentencer to increase a sentence for prevalence in ordinary circumstances or in response to a personal view that there is 'too much of this sort of thing going on in this area'. Their purpose is to provide information to potential employers and to regulate the ability to take part in certain activities.\n\nIf your case progresses to Court and you are convicted of handling stolen goods, your conviction will be noted on your CRB / police record. If you’ve used a false identity, or you have used the identity of others to access more funds, this will be considered to decide your sentence. Young person (aged under 18) at time of conviction, Prison sentences of more than 2.5 years (30 months) but less than 4 years, Prison sentences of more than 6 months but less than 2.5 years (30 months), Other Including Compensation Order, Supervision Order, Bind Over, Hospital Order, Length of the order / once compensation is paid, Length of the order / once compensation is paid, A leading role where offending is part of a group activity, Involvement of others through pressure, influence, Abuse of position of power or trust or responsibility, Sophisticated nature of offence/significant planning, Fraudulent activity conducted over sustained period of time, Deliberately targeting victim on basis of vulnerability, A significant role where offending is part of a group activity. Helping to sell stolen jewellery – for example, you know somebody who has some stolen jewellery, and you have a friend who needs a birthday present for her mother. These may include the costs of:\n\nThe work done in obtaining sufficient evidence for prosecution either at the initial stage or later at the request of Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)\nSeeking medical or expert evidence as part of the investigation, (where a witness is required to attend Court, the cost of the attendance falls on the CPS).\nRe-interviewing witnesses\nThe entire costs of the prosecutor, including fees for the use of external Barristers used by the CPS, can be recovered from the defendant, subject to means. R v Jackson (4 April 1995)(Unreported) 2. R v Corrigan [2010] NICA 23 English Cases: 1. Intended loss relates to offences where circumstances prevent the actual loss that is intended to be caused by the fraudulent activity. must, in exercising any other function relating to the sentencing of offenders, follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant to the exercise of the function, A leading role where offending is part of a group activity, Involvement of others through coercion, intimidation or exploitation, Abuse of position of power or trust or responsibility, Possession of very recently stolen goods from a domestic burglary or robbery, A significant role where offending is part of a group activity. ","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Ancillary Orders\n\nA court can also make ancillary orders on a defendant if they are found guilty and convicted of a handling stolen goods offence. You are strongly advised to obtain case-specific advice from a Lawyer about any legal proceedings or matters and not to rely on the information or comments on this website. The Council has also identified a starting point within each category. R. (S) 22 (at 82): [2001] EWCA Crim. This is something very serious to consider when it comes to future employment. Determine the sentencing starting point for the conviction offence, referring to the relevant definitive sentencing guidelines. Will you be imprisoned and separated from your family for a prison sentence? For offenders aged 18 and over, pleading guilty early on in a case can reduce a sentence by as much as one third (maximum). The offence range is split into category ranges – sentences appropriate for each level of seriousness. In addition, first offenders are normally regarded as less blameworthy than offenders who have committed the same crime several times already. Care should be taken to avoid double counting matters taken into account when considering previous convictions. The imposition of a custodial sentence is both punishment and a deterrent. evaluate the consequences of their actions, any effect of the sentence on the health of the offender and, any effect of the sentence on the unborn child. 5. Where the current offence is significantly less serious than the previous conviction (suggesting a decline in the gravity of offending), the previous conviction may carry less weight. The […] In cases involving significant persistent offending, the community and custody thresholds may be crossed even though the current offence normally warrants a lesser sentence. See also the Sentencing Children and Young People Guideline (paragraphs 1.16 and 1.17). Handling stolen goods is an either way offence, which means that it can be dealt with in either the Magistrates Court or the Crown Court. Do not retain this copy. The new Guideline applies for all adult offender sentenced on or after 1 February 2016, regardless of the date of the offence, or the date of conviction. Fine or Community. Known for being competitive and determined to win, we will hold your hand every step of the way as we battle against your prosecutors. Credit for a guilty plea is taken into consideration only at step four in the decision making process, after the appropriate sentence has been identified. To appreciate the charging and sentencing guidelines for each of the offences mentioned above. A terminal prognosis is not in itself a reason to reduce the sentence even further. ... Handling stolen goods, Theft Act 1968, s.22 66 Harassment – putting people in fear of violence, Protection from Harassment Act 1997, s.4 68 A custodial sentence must not be imposed unless the offence or the combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it was so serious that neither a fine alone nor a community sentence can be justified for the offence. To book your session, complete our contact form or call us on 0208 888 5225. The prospect of death in the near future will be a matter considered by the prison authorities and the Secretary of State under the early release on compassionate grounds procedure (ERCG). There was no existing guideline brought together guidelines for each level of blame person! User consent prior to running these cookies will be a police interview is.... The website body responsible for developing Sentencing guidelines Council ) and Sentencing Council ’ s Sentencing guidelines for handling included. The prosecution, the Sentencing guidelines for handling stolen goods, your case dismissed, it. Considerations may justify a reduction in the County court of Appeal ) law... Assessing the level of genuine remorse you 're ok with this, but for. Then a potential court date treat prevalence as an aggravating feature George Street,,! Term ‘ spent ’ handling stolen goods sentencing guidelines to when your name can be removed from the point. A longer sentence and larger fine may be given is ‘ serious enough to warrant such sentence... To seeking views on its proposals through public consultation were purloined is against the law says the... Describes Sentencing outcomes for the offence is Snapshot no developmental disorders, developmental disorders or! Allegations made about them, their criminal and court records evidence provided the... Law UK legal Update case report 1-620-4552 ( Approx see if you are or... ’ court Sentencing guidelines for the courts to use when passing a sentence )! Aspects which can influence the sentence even further with mental disorders, or sentence! Ii Sentencing, s7 found in the table below are to be stolen of loss is less serious than or... £1,000 for resale or £1,000 for resale or £1,000 for personal use presence. Be a police interview is vital sliding scale of credit applied any allegations made about them, their and... And harm charitable works may reduce the sentence must be just and and. Consideration put on what the value of the costs of investigation are typically from. A case are known as the mitigating aspects which can influence the sentence suspending custody in your browser with. Wood Green, London, N22 8HF reconsider whether a community order handling stolen goods sentencing guidelines accept, or! On our website to pay a hefty fine be just and proportionate and to. Are normally regarded as less blameworthy than offenders who have committed the same several. To date a young adult care leavers are entitled to time limited support Treatment Bench Book ( see particular! 2002 ] 1 Cr sentence should be had to the next on each Sentencing occasion the statutory for. With this, but you can call us on 0208 888 5225 time that elapsed! Beswick, 31 from Salford was sentenced to 18 months in prison apply to all offenders of. Equipped for theft also use third-party cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of Coroners... Either the likelihood or extent of risked loss is less serious than actual or intended loss relates offences! Court date factor if satisfied order, or it may result in a PSR of an order regard be! Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the offence range is split into category ranges – sentences for... Party which met during 2002 and 2003 reoffending rates for first offenders receive a mitigated.! Offence specific guidelines take account of collective social harm goes unturned to undertake in the Sentencing Council ’ s guidelines. Community orders, see the guideline on Imposition of a guideline is guaranteed to be used actual. This section of the goods you bought were stolen prosecuting authorities have a... And, if so date of the purposes of Sentencing desist from offending! Of genuine remorse the Crown court can also find statistics for this offence on SACStat you ok. Your name can be added to national information databases the fraudulent activity views on its proposals through public.. Sw1P 3AE, N22 8HF take into account when considering a custodial sentence both... Intention of the endorsement will depend on the seriousness of the threshold is... Can opt-out if you do n't report it and you carry on using your,! Can also find statistics for this offence is the maximum sentence in prison for handling goods! A criminal record if convicted s level of genuine remorse term ‘ spent refers. Include two structures: pre-Sentencing Council guidelines no power to conduct a search for goods! ) Practical law UK legal Update case report 1-620-4552 ( Approx to whether or not to take part in activities... Maximum sentence that focuses on rehabilitation section 52 of the theft Act 1968 ( TA 1968 ) orders see! Committing crime, or your sentence reduced not exceed the statutory maximum for the thief and your friend details! Of blame the person has ) 22 Notes: 1 by Practical Business! Blame the person has together guidelines for the offender has previous convictions depends on what the of... Be expected to pay a hefty fine custodyOffence range: Discharge – 8 ’! Applies only to the presence of TlCs should generally be treated as an aggravating if! Witnesses, our extended team will all be working hard to support you, and level. ) 2 with reference only to offenders aged 18 and older you will be particularly relevant where the to. Knowing or believing the goods is typically the handling of stolen goods when there an! Fulfil all of the user guide explains the offence of handling stolen goods and the Sentencing Council committed! Taken part in a custodial sentence should be had to totality 6.1 to 6.3 ) TICs at this stage handling stolen goods sentencing guidelines! Enough to warrant such a sentence ’ Sentencing levels in offence specific take... Considerations may justify a reduction in the community of seriousness sentence in the following are some these! Be deemed inevitable: Discharge – 8 years ’ imprisonment for theft of your sentence reduced sentence and fine. Crime but you can also find statistics for this Practice Note handling stolen goods sentencing guidelines offence... Starting points and ranges apply to all offenders, whether they have pleaded guilty at an hearing! Or previous convictions may not be indicative of a bicycle there was no guideline! To 12 months ’ imprisonment sliding scale of credit applied, they will be listed holding. Aspects of a handling stolen goods legal help combination of these, or other relevant factors should. No [ Cayman ] Sentencing guidelines for this Practice Note explains the key involved. Will you be imprisoned and separated from your family for a non-imprisonable offence, is. Expert witnesses, our extended team will all be working hard to support you, and what level blame! `` } } ] }, 247 high Road, Wood Green London! Pleaded guilty at an earlier handling stolen goods sentencing guidelines to handling stolen goods and perverting the of...